Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-F  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '20 at 21:01
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 181
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 349
46% 347 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 0.38
Parallax 0.31
54% 22.1 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 60.8
Splatting 55.3
49% 60.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD120 120GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 28 32 33 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 92%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
185GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 69 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 69.7
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 68.6
50% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB4GU2400.C8FT Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 12GB
2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-F Builds (Compare 556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback