Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	20.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2140-$103 2,489 User benchmarks, average bench 31% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Memory 34.3 1-Core 14.1 2-Core 20.3 17% 22.9 Pts	4-Core 27.8 8-Core 32.3 4% 30 Pts	64-Core 29.7 2% 29.7 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 56 56 57 56 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.6% Poor	Read 155 Write 68.7 Mixed 67.4 SusWrite 55.4 19% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 8.6 34% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 10.7 DQ Write 16.6 DQ Mixed 12.2 10% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46 8,198 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 31GB free Firmware: P22OABEA SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 56 56 57 57 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 56.8 Write 50.7 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 55.3 36% 49.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.83 GB/s	Latency 231 17% 231 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16