Asus G73Jw

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus G73Jw (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G73Jw
Memory	10.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '20 at 08:22
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 90.6 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 105 57% 87.3 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 235 25% 198 Pts	64-Core 236 15% 236 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 2042) 1.5GB Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 296.16 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 6% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 384GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 218 208 212 206 206 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.2% Average	Read 230 Write 206 Mixed 209 SusWrite 213 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 22.2 4K Mixed 17.8 59% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 164 126% 170 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 125%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59 15,217 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 260GB free Firmware: PB3O SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 70 72 66 62 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 75.8 Write 71.9 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 68.7 46% 63.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 42%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 12GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.4 8.1 7.6 8.4 7.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	7.19% Terrible	Read 28.8 Write 11.2 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 8 15% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.19% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU1600S11-4G-EDEG ASU1600S11-4G-EDEG 02FE EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 02FE EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 12GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	40.1% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 12.8 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 11 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G73Jw Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jw

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	88x
Core i7 Q 840Intel $85Bench 56%, 1,339 samples	3x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	96x
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 4x2GBUnknownBench 42%, 289 samples	20x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4x2GBHynixBench 41%, 455 samples	19x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 3x2GBHynixBench 35%, 234 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16