Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 85FA
Memory	7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190503
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '20 at 08:34
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 84.9 1-Core 126 2-Core 211 81% 140 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 647 62% 512 Pts	64-Core 659 41% 659 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB 6,924 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 633GB free (System drive) Firmware: 17.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 157 158 118 57 140 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 543GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 26 33 75 41 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 15.7 Write 24.1 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 39.7 35% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 18% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905624-054.A00G Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2400, 2667 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 15 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 16.9 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,602x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,502x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	496x

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 113%, 8,196 samples	422x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	414x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	278x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	716x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	430x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	399x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16