Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200407
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '20 at 17:06
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Memory 68.2 1-Core 154 2-Core 306 92% 176 Pts	4-Core 541 8-Core 931 89% 736 Pts	64-Core 1,448 90% 1,448 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Sapphire(1DA2 E410) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 91% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 370GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 864 465 464 463 464 457 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 195GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2137 899 901 903 901 898 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	337% Outstanding	Read 2,718 Write 2,625 Mixed 1,939 SusWrite 1,106 470% 2,097 MB/s	4K Read 70.8 4K Write 188 4K Mixed 99.6 334% 119 MB/s	DQ Read 1,352 DQ Write 1,187 DQ Mixed 1,277 955% 1,272 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 337% Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 188 190 190 189 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 160 Mixed 89.3 SusWrite 188 116% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB 73,741 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.4% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 26.9 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 26.5 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 164%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 187%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	398x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	381x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	333x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	271x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	151x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	144x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	171x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	115x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	71x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	121x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	67x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,613

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16