Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315 16,964 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Memory 54.2 1-Core 36.1 2-Core 66.9 34% 52.4 Pts	4-Core 115 8-Core 147 17% 131 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6470M 4,805 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 161A) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 2.31 2% 2.35 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 2.52 2% 2.15 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 57 1.9 3.6 100 48 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.9% Poor	Read 273 Write 110 Mixed 102 SusWrite 62 30% 137 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 7.7 33% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 95.4 DQ Write 7.6 DQ Mixed 41.1 33% 48 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.8% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 11.3 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.27 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 6470MAMDBench 2%, 4,805 samples	117x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x
Radeon HD 7400MAMDBench 2%, 4,688 samples	30x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16