Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 80% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3 (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171108
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '20 at 02:21
Run Duration	274 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Memory 89.6 1-Core 138 2-Core 278 93% 168 Pts	4-Core 471 8-Core 754 75% 612 Pts	64-Core 757 47% 757 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 135 Reflection 147 Parallax 126 110% 136 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 134 Splatting 110 97% 119 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 12,504 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: V9002s16 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,900 Write 995 Mixed 852 274% 1,249 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 49.9 188% 71.8 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 757 DQ Mixed 465 383% 535 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 244%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 48GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 227 132 86 94 92 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 480 Mixed 412 SusWrite 184 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 62.4 214% 76.2 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 359 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 47GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 303 306 305 304 304 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 459 Write 461 Mixed 403 SusWrite 322 93% 411 MB/s	4K Read 44.9 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 58.9 204% 72.6 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 358 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 124%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98 11,843 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 43GB free Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 62 121 53 62 53 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Read 608 Write 307 Mixed 390 SusWrite 99.7 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 47 172% 67 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 179 149% 208 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 107%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 127GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 278 292 295 295 312 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 383 Write 318 Mixed 231 SusWrite 292 69% 306 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 63 4K Mixed 25.2 95% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 289 DQ Write 90.5 DQ Mixed 140 116% 173 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 86%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 223GB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 140 116 95 84 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 132 Write 122 Mixed 72 SusWrite 110 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 96%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 21GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 51 51 51 51 51 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 138 Write 41 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 47.8 90% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.2 160% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 859B CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD2 029E CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 24GB 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.7% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 17.4 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 18.4 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	349x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	203x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	152x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	132x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	57x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	33x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	31x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	60x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	39x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $383

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16