Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime10 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 20:25
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 242
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 655
64% 527 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 116
Parallax 109
86% 110 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 98.7
Splatting 103
82% 99.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 137 52 53 54 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 446
Mixed 391
SusWrite 83.3
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 48
168% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 252
210% 303 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 91%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
257GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 468 468 472 442 282 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 478
Mixed 455
SusWrite 432
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 59.1
206% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%
Galax GXTA1C0480A 480GB
202GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 378 153 167 64 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 82% Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
133GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 138 137 138 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 135
Write 119
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 137
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
493GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 129 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 156
Write 132
Mixed 93.9
SusWrite 128
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.8% Good
MC Read 21
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 20.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $733
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback