| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Biostar H310MHP (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191230 |
| Uptime | 9.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 06 '20 at 20:59 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
85.6%
Excellent
|
84% 152 Pts
|
72% 560 Pts
|
42% 686 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
59.8%
Above average
|
64% 73.3 fps
|
51% 63.7 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.5%
Below average
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
52% 76.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H310MHP Builds (Compare 1,020 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 357x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 285x |
| Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 45x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 134x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 94x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 54x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $271 |