Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 2447ET5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 2447ET5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2447ET5
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '17 at 23:40
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 60.8
36% 53 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 167
18% 142 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M
Legend(17AA 21F6) 2GB
CLim: 745 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 354.45
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 4.97
4% 4.48 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 5.87
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 509
Write 404
Mixed 352
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 27.3
105% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 81.3
DQ Mixed 43.5
46% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 Elpida EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F M471B1G73BH0-CK0 Elpida EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2447ET5 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2447ET5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $629
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback