Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 93.8 2-Core 188 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 337 43% 326 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 350.12 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.6% Terrible	Lighting 3.83 Reflection 5 Parallax 3.31 3% 4.05 fps	MRender 0.57 Gravity 4.57 Splatting 26.7 10% 10.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.6% Great: 7%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 368GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 248 Write 133 Mixed 148 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 30.1 4K Mixed 25.1 82% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 28.1 DQ Write 40.8 DQ Mixed 32.4 25% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 699GB free Firmware: CC4B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 156 Write 110 Mixed 85 87% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-006.A00LF 8GB 268 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 16.5 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 16.4 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	26x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	17x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	15x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $639

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16