Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-10855M 1,078 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Memory 80.7 1-Core 148 2-Core 268 91% 165 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 712 76% 604 Pts	64-Core 888 55% 888 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design 351 User benchmarks, average bench 87% Legend(17AA 22B8) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 443.32 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 122 Parallax 77 94% 105 fps	MRender 155 Gravity 107 Splatting 92.5 94% 118 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 96%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2156 2048 2216 2018 1579 1540 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	345% Outstanding	Read 2,361 Write 2,363 Mixed 1,695 SusWrite 1,926 469% 2,086 MB/s	4K Read 57.7 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 78.7 258% 89.1 MB/s	DQ Read 942 DQ Write 1,421 DQ Mixed 1,078 845% 1,147 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 345% Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2436 2220 2348 1933 1595 1589 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	341% Outstanding	Read 2,561 Write 2,443 Mixed 1,890 SusWrite 2,020 501% 2,229 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 58.8 218% 83.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,203 DQ Write 958 DQ Mixed 1,091 814% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 341% Great: 435%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M474A4G43AB1-CVF 2x31.5GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	MC Read 35.6 MC Write 38.4 MC Mixed 29.3 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 42.3 SC Mixed 30.9 89% 31 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	25x
Quadro RTX 3000NvidiaBench 67%, 3,632 samples	11x
Quadro T1000NvidiaBench 37%, 3,238 samples	11x

SSD
TOSHIBA 2TBKxg6apnv2t04Bench 245%, 198 samples	13x
TOSHIBA 1TBKxg6aznv1t02Bench 229%, 1,507 samples	10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	9x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	8x
M471A4G43AB1-CWE 2x31.5GBSamsungBench 92%, 2,607 samples	7x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 49%, 13,312 samples	6x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16