Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '20 at 07:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 223
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 446
60% 445 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
PNY(196E 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 44.7
Reflection 45
Parallax 40.4
36% 43.3 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 36.6
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 308 164 95 93 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 431
Write 323
Mixed 325
SusWrite 166
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 34.1
136% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 190
169% 252 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TL48G30S8KGRGB15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback