Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A55M-VG3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-VG3+  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 06:46
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Memory 35.8
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 34.2
25% 37.1 Pts
4-Core 66
8-Core 65.7
9% 65.8 Pts
64-Core 31.7
2% 31.7 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
ASRock(1849 9993) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 2%
Nvidia GeForce 210
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$37
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 50 44 48 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 13.7
Write 18
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 46.6
22% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 69%
WD WD5000ABYS-01TNA0 500GB-$80
449GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 80 81 82 82 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 70.9
Write 74
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 80
52% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 Kingston 99U5474-025.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 5
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 8
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A55M-VG3+ Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-VG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback