Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140530
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '20 at 18:23
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$127 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Memory 95.4 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 88% 155 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 471 64% 476 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% MSI(1462 2775) 3GB CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.9.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	38% Below average	Lighting 49.4 Reflection 33 Parallax 62 40% 48.1 fps	MRender 31.5 Gravity 50.1 Splatting 40.8 34% 40.8 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 85 54 65 100 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Read 430 Write 400 Mixed 349 SusWrite 133 73% 328 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 99.1 4K Mixed 53.2 167% 61 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 246 216% 322 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 126%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 90 91 91 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	50.5% Above average	Read 86.2 Write 78.3 Mixed 53.3 SusWrite 89.4 56% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 63%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 668GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 79 80 81 81 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 58.5 Write 100 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 81.7 56% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 2x8GB 7,008 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 19.3 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 17 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 56 72% 56 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	121x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	73x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	64x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	49x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	25x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	23x

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $783

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16