Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2840 20,923 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Memory 36.6 1-Core 21.9 2-Core 39 22% 32.5 Pts	4-Core 35 8-Core 41.4 5% 38.2 Pts	64-Core 46 3% 46 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 37%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB 5,673 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 141 145 141 144 143 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.8% Below average	Read 220 Write 134 Mixed 123 SusWrite 142 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 17.4 48% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 124 95% 130 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 1x8GB 5,265 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 219 18% 219 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	33x
Pentium N3540IntelBench 33%, 17,036 samples	15x
Celeron N2940IntelBench 33%, 3,995 samples	8x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	58x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	7x
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 1x2GBHynixBench 18%, 3,854 samples	6x
TMT451S6BFR8A-PBHJ 1x4GBTeikonBench 25%, 1,233 samples	5x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16