Toshiba SATELLITE L70-C-10L

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L70-C-10L (all builds)
Motherboard	FF40 0681
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150921
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '20 at 19:27
Run Duration	436 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	33%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5200U 107,407 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	32.9% Below average	Memory 35.5 1-Core 22 2-Core 46.9 22% 34.8 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 211 24% 190 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 F832) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.17% Terrible	Lighting 5.27 Reflection 7.92 Parallax 6.69 4% 6.63 fps	MRender 7.71 Gravity 4.97 Splatting 11.3 7% 8.01 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.17% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 313GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 291 341 334 328 336 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 378 Write 354 Mixed 317 SusWrite 325 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 16.9 54% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 152 114% 152 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 124%
ST350082 0AS 500GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 26GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 35 38 37 37 38 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 4.2 Mixed 10 SusWrite 35.3 26% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 17%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 5,745 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 57GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 33 37 30 23 25 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 89.6 Write 30.4 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 30.8 58% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.2 136% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB 34,976 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 15.7 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.4 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 225 18% 225 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE L70-C-10L Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L70-C-10L

CPU
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	3x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	3x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16