Asus H110M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	83.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-K (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180509
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '20 at 11:03
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 84.2 1-Core 130 2-Core 251 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 477 65% 483 Pts	64-Core 498 31% 498 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.1% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 113 Parallax 106 84% 107 fps	MRender 99.9 Gravity 96.9 Splatting 101 81% 99.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB 269 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 76 84 86 87 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 480 Write 424 Mixed 341 SusWrite 111 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 36.9 127% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 173 145% 219 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 123%
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB 348 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 276GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 333 395 412 410 393 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 458 Write 414 Mixed 329 SusWrite 366 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 38 133% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 91.2 DQ Mixed 159 137% 210 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 132%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB 962 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 90 92 93 89 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 88.2 Write 89.2 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 90 59% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR1 2x8GB 2,335 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.5% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 25.4 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 29 SC Mixed 23.6 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	1,115x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	639x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	554x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	841x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	469x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	367x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	312x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	162x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	156x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	112x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	80x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16