Today's hottest deals

Medion MS-7857

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMedion MS-7857  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7857
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 14:09
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 63
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 122
51% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 202
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 284C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27% Poor
Lighting 31.1
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 36.5
25% 32.3 fps
MRender 41.6
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 33
30% 37.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 52 52 53 52 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 230
Write 71
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 53.3
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 10
59% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 52.1
DQ Mixed 59.3
54% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7857 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MS-7857

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $274
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback