Lenovo 20QUZ4QLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20QUZ4QLUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20QUZ4QLUS
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 03:12
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2276M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 146
2-Core 280
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 733
79% 626 Pts
64-Core 883
55% 883 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro T1000
Legend(17AA 22A8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1530 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 443.32
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35% Below average
Lighting 44
Reflection 43.7
Parallax 37.9
36% 41.9 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 42.7
33% 40.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35%
Great: 41%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4M2QEXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,210
Write 1,656
Mixed 1,504
397% 1,790 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 55.8
180% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 571
DQ Mixed 345
285% 399 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 380%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 27.4
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 27.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback