Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X532FAC_S532FA

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X532FAC_S532FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X532FAC
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191218
Uptime	8.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '20 at 00:32
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	72%
CPU Throttled	78%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10510U 51,080 User benchmarks, average bench 56% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Memory 49.4 1-Core 57.2 2-Core 142 46% 82.7 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 438 42% 349 Pts	64-Core 500 31% 500 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1B51) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	5.11% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 3.44 4% 4.52 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 11.4 6% 7.42 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.11% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 75 50 51 102 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 594 Write 350 Mixed 390 SusWrite 82.5 78% 354 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 29.4 99% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 253 181% 232 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 209%
SDHC Card 16GB 1,063 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 15GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 34 35 34 34 32 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 30.5 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 33.3 39% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.3 85% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 1x8GB 1,684 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 10.5 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 163 25% 163 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X532FAC_S532FA Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X532FAC_S532FA

CPU
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples	34x
Core i7-10510UIntelBench 56%, 51,080 samples	18x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	52x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	15x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	13x
INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8 512GBNvmeBench 149%, 6,470 samples	10x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	13x
HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 1,684 samples	11x
4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 1,279 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16