PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Studio XPS 8000 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0X231R |
Memory | 3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20091221 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 06 '20 at 16:26 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 54% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.7%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
17.5%
Very poor
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 30 2.3 1.5 2.1 MB/s
|
23.5%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
277GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
|
8.98%
Terrible
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
289GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 53 74 71 74 75 MB/s
|
36.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
36.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 118x |
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 51x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 21x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 13x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $385 |