Dell Studio XPS 8000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio XPS 8000  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0X231R
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '20 at 16:26
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 118
56% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 270
29% 229 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
Asus(1043 04B6) 2GB
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.7.1
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 17
17% 18.9 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 29.2
19% 22.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 30 2.3 1.5 2.1 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.5% Poor
Read 181
Write 127
Mixed 143
SusWrite 44.5
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 10.2
42% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 24.1
DQ Mixed 16.6
14% 20 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 56%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
277GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.98% Terrible
Read 33.4
Write 29.6
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 28.7
7% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 5.1
19% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 8.98%
Great: 99%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
289GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 53 74 71 74 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 61.8
Write 74.6
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 65.6
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 7
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 8000 Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 8000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $385
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback