Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	45% Average	Memory 62.7 1-Core 63.7 2-Core 102 47% 76 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 159 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN1ZABHA 256GB 2,574 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: M603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 191 199 200 199 201 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.7% Average	Read 208 Write 206 Mixed 197 SusWrite 198 46% 202 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 18.9 61% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 157 119% 159 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 106%
Philips USB Flash Drive 8GB 456 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2 3.7 3.2 3.7 3.3 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.32% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 9.8 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 3.1 11% 9.88 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.32% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT1970ED48E8F1333 2x2GB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 10.5 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	109x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	36x
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	26x

RAM
HP594908-HR1-ELD 2x2GBKingstonBench 24%, 207 samples	13x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	9x
HMT125S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 27%, 878 samples	9x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16