Asus M52BC_M32BC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M52BC_M32BC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150812
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 16:14
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 39.7
2-Core 79.9
44% 66.2 Pts
4-Core 94.4
8-Core 111
13% 103 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
496GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 59 93 108 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 142
Write 106
Mixed 54
SusWrite 96.4
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBGR/4G 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.5
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M52BC_M32BC Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52BC_M32BC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $42
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback