Cisco R200-1120402W

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCisco R200-1120402W  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco R200-1120402W
Memory44.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '20 at 04:45
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 165
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 560
53% 441 Pts
64-Core 1,172
72% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 233 236 231 223 222 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.8% Above average
Read 215
Write 202
Mixed 228
SusWrite 230
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 28
72% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 151
114% 152 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 125%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
27GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 4 6.9 18 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.63% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 8
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 9.5
14% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
46% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.63%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12x4GB
12 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback