| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190830 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 23 '20 at 13:30 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
79.1%
Very good
|
78% 140 Pts
|
69% 559 Pts
|
57% 915 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
101%
Outstanding
|
100% 121 fps
|
104% 133 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 98 93 93 87 75 MB/s
|
29.9%
Poor
|
36% 159 MB/s
|
51% 19.6 MB/s
|
35% 71.1 MB/s
|
|
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
122GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 814 528 528 530 531 531 MB/s
|
130%
Outstanding
|
170% 766 MB/s
|
115% 37.2 MB/s
|
86% 148 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
86.4%
Excellent
|
89% 31.3 GB/s
|
75% 26.2 GB/s
|
46% 86.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,035 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,461x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,304x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,006x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 949x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 734x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 653x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 103% - Outstanding | Total price: $322 |