| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Acer Aspire TC-885 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Acer Aspire TC-885 |
| Memory | 4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190116 |
| Uptime | 7.9 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 28 '20 at 16:01 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.7%
Good
|
74% 135 Pts
|
45% 322 Pts
|
18% 296 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Sapphire(174B 5454) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.7%
Poor
|
26% 33 fps
|
25% 31 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 191 175 168 162 142 MB/s
|
82.9%
Excellent
|
89% 402 MB/s
|
94% 33.5 MB/s
|
265% 382 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
244GB free
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 101 103 104 103 104 MB/s
|
49.4%
Average
|
54% 72.7 MB/s
|
145% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
63.3%
Good
|
67% 23.4 GB/s
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
42% 95.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Aspire TC-885 Builds (Compare 1,836 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Acer Aspire TC-885
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 758x |
| Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 510x |
| Core i3-9100Intel $145Bench 80%, 7,621 samples | 162x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples | 520x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 165x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 159x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 101% - Outstanding | Total price: $131 |