Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '20 at 05:00
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	73%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$290 332,643 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 68.3 1-Core 117 2-Core 148 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 768 62% 525 Pts	64-Core 1,064 71% 1,064 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$480 177,757 User benchmarks, average bench 99% Asus(1043 8703) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.1% Outstanding	Lighting 112 Reflection 101 Parallax 114 91% 109 fps	MRender 155 Gravity 106 Splatting 96.7 91% 119 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 108%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS2040 256GB SSD 75 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 54 36 76 38 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 403 Write 229 Mixed 313 SusWrite 60.1 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 0.5 56% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 36.4 DQ Write 6.8 DQ Mixed 1.1 6% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$68 392,883 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 155 155 165 159 165 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 148 Write 113 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 159 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905702-120.A00G 2x8GB 952 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	67.7% Good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 21.7 74% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 13.4 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 16,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 117%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $190

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $290Bench 97%, 332,643 samples	5,285x
Core i9-9900KIntel $380Bench 98%, 292,441 samples	4,387x
Core i5-9600KIntel $200Bench 95%, 233,603 samples	2,434x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 118%, 399,694 samples	2,262x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $770Bench 138%, 160,541 samples	1,211x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $1,264Bench 173%, 247,718 samples	1,193x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $85Bench 290%, 259,680 samples	1,076x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 329%, 178,345 samples	972x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $138Bench 308%, 203,710 samples	970x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $79Bench 85%, 403,833 samples	742x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 84%, 186,431 samples	735x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $95Bench 86%, 177,643 samples	616x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $1,154

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $200	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16