Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 08:00
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 289
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 836
86% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,098
68% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Lighting 66.5
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 63.5
54% 66.5 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 63.2
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 111 77 69 71 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 454
Mixed 314
SusWrite 123
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 53.8
182% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
148% 196 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 114%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
75GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 91 88 84 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 89
Write 48.2
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 87.6
51% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145
142GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 69 71 64 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 68.5
Write 42
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 68.5
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD4AGU880-32A160T 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
64.5% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 21.1
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback