Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17C6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL73 8RD
MotherboardMSI MS-17C6  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 10:45
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41% Average
Memory 52.9
1-Core 34.8
2-Core 59.3
32% 49 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 374
30% 265 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 121A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.7% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 3.4
2% 15.3 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 4.6
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.7%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$67
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 769 729 785 781 756 498 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,173
Write 894
Mixed 667
SusWrite 720
193% 863 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 22.9
93% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 218
181% 259 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 131%
Great: 209%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
928GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 127 125 130 122 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 96.7
Write 127
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 125
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 22.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17C6 Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17C6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback