Lenovo 20BFS31C00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20BFS31C00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BFS31C00
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 22:23
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 178
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 503
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730M
Legend(17AA 221E) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.9% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 8.4
6% 7.33 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 7.7
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.9%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000H1 256GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 267 265 259 243 254 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 278
Mixed 245
SusWrite 259
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 36
138% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 246
204% 297 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback