Asus Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Q87M-E  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 15:41
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$255
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 79.6
2-Core 118
60% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 483
45% 365 Pts
64-Core 353
24% 353 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 44.1
Reflection 43.9
Parallax 39.6
36% 42.5 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 28
34% 35.9 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 308 199 271 367 393 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 464
Write 350
Mixed 304
SusWrite 314
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 30.4
118% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 157
163% 269 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
558GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 135 94 139 129 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 138
Write 141
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 118
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.9% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $526
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback