Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-4300M APU-$88 2,270 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Memory 41.5 1-Core 32.2 2-Core 66.2 29% 46.6 Pts	4-Core 61.5 8-Core 64.3 8% 62.9 Pts	64-Core 64 4% 64 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7420G 1,918 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 17ED) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	1.01% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 3 1% 2.07 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.01% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 359GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 195 287 271 282 285 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 330 Write 280 Mixed 296 SusWrite 268 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 32.3 108% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 136 102% 135 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP594908-HR1-ELD 2x2GB 207 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.13 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.5 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	1x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	3x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 1x4GBMicronBench 27%, 6,018 samples	3x
M471B5173CB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,184 samples	3x

Value: 30% - Poor

Total price: $188

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16