| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121015 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 14 '20 at 13:20 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.7%
Above average
|
45% 68.1 Pts
|
26% 218 Pts
|
17% 277 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
16% 21.1 fps
|
18% 22.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OCZ Vector 128GB-$71
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 333 339 340 159 107 MB/s
|
61.3%
Good
|
67% 298 MB/s
|
92% 33.3 MB/s
|
35% 52.3 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 120 123 123 123 121 MB/s
|
76.2%
Very good
|
81% 111 MB/s
|
162% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
30.7%
Below average
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
24% 8.43 GB/s
|
46% 87.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 990FX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 71 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme4 - $229
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 37x |
| FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 5x |
| FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 3x |
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 3x |
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $814 |