Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3-$170 4,850 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 209 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 395 52% 392 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P4600 2,141 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11E7) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 7.2 3% 4.53 fps	MRender 8.7 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 5.1 4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 64GB-$92 7,336 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 94 100 93 100 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 327 Write 88.5 Mixed 122 SusWrite 96.7 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 57.1 4K Mixed 13.2 80% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 94.5 DQ Mixed 81.2 75% 117 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 16GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	60.5% Good	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 18.3 61% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 20.3 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	59x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	33x
HD Graphics P4600IntelBench 3%, 2,141 samples	26x

RAM
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples	17x
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	13x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 3,272 samples	12x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $196

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16