PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Default string (all builds) |
Motherboard | INTEL X99 |
Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200603 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 19 '20 at 17:27 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | CHL-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
63.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
MSI(1462 8D97) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 4.5 4.3 5.5 6.9 336 MB/s
|
63.3%
Good
|
|||
3 256GB SSD 256GB
172GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 11 16 13 20 24 MB/s
|
2.82%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
287GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 39 35 39 38 MB/s
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 160GB-$34
105GB free
Firmware: GMBOA57A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 72 71 71 72 MB/s
|
37.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
53%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 1,018x |
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples | 955x |
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples | 906x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 485x |
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 478x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 458x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |