Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 85FF
Memory	0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200716
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '20 at 13:29
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	69%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 73.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 187 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 526 48% 404 Pts	64-Core 544 34% 544 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% HP(103C 85FF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.6% Average	Lighting 56.7 Reflection 59 Parallax 54.8 46% 56.8 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 46.9 Splatting 44.5 36% 43 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 46%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 85FF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 55.4 Parallax 6.5 5% 22.6 fps	MRender 7.6 Gravity 6 Splatting 9.7 7% 7.77 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB 20,171 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 229 237 236 221 231 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 1,239 Write 804 Mixed 780 SusWrite 243 170% 766 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 22.7 4K Mixed 25.7 92% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 715 DQ Write 42.9 DQ Mixed 62.7 125% 274 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 235%
Seagate FireCuda SSD 1TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 501GB free Firmware: 2364 SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 423 454 415 429 427 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 402 Write 399 Mixed 390 SusWrite 428 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 13.9 48% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 42.4 DQ Mixed 56.3 46% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 86%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 791GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 119 119 124 110 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 128 Write 116 Mixed 34.6 SusWrite 120 72% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 2x4GB 16,220 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.3% Average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 17.3 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 0.6 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 94.3 42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	519x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	251x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 57%, 12,899 samples	198x

SSD
hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GBSKBench 131%, 6,904 samples	145x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	95x
TOSHIBA 512GBKbg30zmv512gBench 122%, 10,256 samples	62x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	217x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	68x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	59x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16