HP 870-157c

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP 870-157c (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B4B
Memory	24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170809
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '20 at 06:29
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 122 2-Core 225 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 590 61% 490 Pts	64-Core 599 37% 599 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% HP(103C 5166) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40% Below average	Lighting 48.8 Reflection 58.3 Parallax 72.5 40% 59.9 fps	MRender 61.6 Gravity 45.7 Splatting 43.5 40% 50.3 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-256G-1006 256GB 2,611 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3511006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 231 175 205 126 132 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Read 385 Write 321 Mixed 236 SusWrite 184 63% 281 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 75.8 4K Mixed 30 116% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 341 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 206 171% 249 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 186 188 188 188 188 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 207 Write 161 Mixed 85.9 SusWrite 187 117% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 4x8GB 760 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	63.3% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 20.3 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 19.3 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870-157c Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: HP 870-157c

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	22x

GPU
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	11x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	4x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	3x

SSD
SD7SB6S-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 77%, 2,611 samples	6x
SNVS250G 250GBKingstonBench 160%, 4,574 samples	3x
840 Evo 1TBSamsung $199Bench 105%, 23,857 samples	1x

RAM
RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 4x8GBRamaxelBench 71%, 222 samples	8x
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 73%, 760 samples	7x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 80%, 730 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $255

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16