Today's hottest deals

Asus A78M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A78M-A  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 00:49
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 95%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 30.4
2-Core 50.1
36% 50.4 Pts
4-Core 79.4
8-Core 71.1
10% 75.2 Pts
64-Core 71.9
4% 71.9 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D
Asus(1043 8526) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 4.7
0% 4.17 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 6.9
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
579GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 26 26 30 35 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 8.2
Write 24.5
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 28.9
14% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 20GB
1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 5.9
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A78M-A Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A78M-A - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback