Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 08:19
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 881
90% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,124
70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$294
Asus(1043 86D2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.7% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 105
Parallax 111
89% 108 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 98.1
Splatting 89.5
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 249 243 237 232 223 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 505
Write 303
Mixed 287
SusWrite 242
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 37.5
133% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 168
135% 192 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
4GB free
Firmware: SC23
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80.7
Write 79.5
Mixed 50
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 98%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
136GB free
Firmware: 9128
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 65 68 68 67 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 88.7
Write 86.7
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 66.9
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB
568GB free
Firmware: 9128
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 65 68 68 67 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 99
Write 89.5
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 66.8
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 74%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
158GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 105 104 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 134
Write 140
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 105
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Elite DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB-$250
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 32.2
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 32.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,026
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback