Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Cyberpowerpc C SERIES (all builds)
Motherboard	ASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory	2.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	17.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '20 at 19:16
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 88.2 1-Core 145 2-Core 266 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 608 71% 553 Pts	64-Core 801 50% 801 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% EVGA(3842 3061) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.1% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 108 Parallax 120 96% 115 fps	MRender 179 Gravity 110 Splatting 102 103% 130 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68 97,624 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 280GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 678 446 262 263 274 277 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 1,447 Write 1,540 Mixed 1,096 SusWrite 367 249% 1,112 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 58.1 200% 73.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,197 DQ Write 961 DQ Mixed 1,006 773% 1,055 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 237%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 744GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 163 162 162 162 163 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 169 Mixed 97.7 SusWrite 162 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE1 2x8GB 1,938 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	66.8% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 21.3 68% 24 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 21.1 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,516 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 52%

Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	2,310x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	678x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	352x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	1,299x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	532x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	326x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	990x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	206x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	185x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 14,178 samples	235x
DDR4 3000 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 4,421 samples	177x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	175x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16