Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DANA_MB
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180831
Uptime	11.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '20 at 22:59
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 88.7 2-Core 162 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 412 49% 377 Pts	64-Core 507 31% 507 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2001) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6169 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 30 Parallax 7.6 0% 12.6 fps	MRender 9 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 10.7 7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.63% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 319 308 316 317 318 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	Read 974 Write 981 Mixed 785 SusWrite 317 171% 764 MB/s	4K Read 52.3 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 25.6 147% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 947 DQ Write 586 DQ Mixed 425 409% 653 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 249%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 119 121 120 121 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 115 Write 137 Mixed 56.9 SusWrite 123 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.3% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 30.2 MC Mixed 22.7 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 21.3 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,057x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,066x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,443x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	595x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	397x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	248x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,751x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16