Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 2,697 User benchmarks, average bench 35% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Memory 15.6 1-Core 45.6 2-Core 76.6 24% 45.9 Pts	4-Core 68.2 8-Core 125 12% 96.6 Pts	64-Core 72.2 4% 72.2 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605 14,651 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 1360) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	0.58% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 1 1% 0.8 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 1 1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.58% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1014 256GB 2,257 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 423 Write 361 Mixed 385 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 27.3 98% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 200 153% 209 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 180%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 8GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 7.6 20% 6.93 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 355 11% 355 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	223x
Pentium Silver N5030IntelBench 35%, 2,697 samples	91x
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	52x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	370x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	123x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ1 128GBKingstonBench 94%, 4,828 samples	81x
OM8PDP3128B-AA1 128GBKingstonBench 107%, 304 samples	61x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	48x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16