Alienware Aurora

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 04VWF2
Memory11.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100406
Uptime28.7 Days
Run DateJan 07 '21 at 12:04
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 59.2
2-Core 98.9
54% 81.6 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 251
28% 218 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 31.8
19% 27 fps
MRender 32.8
Gravity 30
Splatting 25.2
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 123 91 92 100 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.9% Below average
Read 244
Write 189
Mixed 200
SusWrite 100
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 12.7
64% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 23.1
42% 84.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
321GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 112 113 113 113 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 119
Write 111
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 111
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
530GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 137 145 145 144 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 189
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 141
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 107%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 127 135 132 131 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 136
Write 143
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 130
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
284% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 104%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
26GB free
Firmware: 0737
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.2 4.3 4.5 4.2 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
9.54% Terrible
Read 28.4
Write 27.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 4.3
16% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 103%
WDC WD50 00LPVX-60V0TT0 500GB
336GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.63% Terrible
Read 29.8
Write 25.6
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 4.1
27% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.63%
Great: 14%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
23GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 23.9
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 4.1
26% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 59%
WD My Book 25DA 4TB
66GB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 4.1 4.3 4 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 24.1
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 4.2
26% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 68%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1TB
5GB free, PID 0b19
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.14% Terrible
Read 26.9
Write 25.7
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 4.1
24% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 6.14%
Great: 53%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
67GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 2.3 0 2.8 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Read 16.6
Write 26.1
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 3.6
15% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
26% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 62%
Samsung M3 Station 2TB
71GB free, PID 60f3
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 26.8
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 4.1
27% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 23%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
19GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 24.6
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 4.1
26% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 58%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 64GB
56GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 0.8 3.6 3.5 3.9 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.75% Terrible
Read 29.6
Write 17.1
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 3.1
21% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.75%
Great: 35%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
103GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 20.5
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 3.9
23% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.8
140% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 14GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
34.5% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.7
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora Builds (Compare 504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Alienware Aurora

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $249
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback