PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte B365M DS3H (all builds) |
Memory | 7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190813 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 08 '21 at 14:40 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 53% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
91.4%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.4%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 259 224 233 164 151 MB/s
|
61.8%
Good
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
108GB free
Firmware: 1AA01117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 69 66 70 69 MB/s
|
48.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
64.7%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2,527x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,040x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 976x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 618x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 600x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 499x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $553 |