Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20388

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20388  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo B50-45
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140610
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 22:10
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 66.7
36% 53.8 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 98.5
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 3800) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.26% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.57 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.26%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 69 50 72 72 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 52.9
Write 71.4
Mixed 29
SusWrite 67.5
40% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 58%
Mass Storage Device 320GB
285GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 32 34 33 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 30.4
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 32.7
41% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20388 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20388

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $14
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback