Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Memory 3.23 1-Core 74.4 2-Core 133 33% 70.1 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 121 22% 152 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Acer(1025 111E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4454 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	5.02% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 5.7 5% 5.07 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 9.1 6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.02% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB 50,765 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 332 337 317 372 217 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 366 Write 348 Mixed 320 SusWrite 308 76% 335 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 15.9 76% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 297 210% 262 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT52L512M32D2PF-10 2x4GB 8,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	41.5% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 14.7 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 10.5 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 472 8% 472 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	96x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	17x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	17x
RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 256GBKingstonBench 73%, 2,871 samples	16x

RAM
2x4GBHynixBench 60%, 11,918 samples	50x
2x2GBHynixBench 40%, 7,517 samples	16x
K4E8E324EB-EGCF 2x2GBSamsungBench 48%, 710 samples	13x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16