Lenovo 10T700A8UK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 10T700A8UK (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 312D
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200217
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '21 at 11:00
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100T 1,165 User benchmarks, average bench 75% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 77 1-Core 110 2-Core 198 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 378 49% 367 Pts	64-Core 427 26% 427 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3) 32,403 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 312D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 6.5 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 7.3 5% 6.77 fps	Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.2 0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ128HBHQ-000L1 128GB 491 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5L1QFXV7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 113 112 108 125 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 933 Write 66.3 Mixed 283 SusWrite 117 75% 350 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 20.4 101% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 179 138% 193 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 171%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$132 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 452GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 402 423 425 429 428 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 433 Mixed 402 SusWrite 412 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 45.4 144% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 293 238% 337 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 125%
Generic MassStorageClass 197GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 55GB free, PID 0749 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.3 9.1 9.1 10 9.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 63.9 Write 12.2 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 9.6 25% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.9 58% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 34%
Generic MassStorageClass 256GB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 218GB free, PID 0749 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.7 9.6 9.6 11 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 79.3 Write 37.7 Mixed 19 SusWrite 10 40% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 2.9 137% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB 42,443 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.2% Good	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 20.8 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 18.1 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16