Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190528
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '21 at 07:40
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 124 2-Core 243 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 962 84% 714 Pts	64-Core 959 59% 959 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2952 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.79 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 191 Reflection 26 Parallax 47.4 156% 88.2 fps	Gravity 184 Splatting 5.3 71% 94.8 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,555 Write 2,264 Mixed 1,448 463% 2,089 MB/s	4K Read 56.5 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 74.8 273% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 1,539 DQ Write 1,224 DQ Mixed 1,386 1,036% 1,383 MB/s
Poor: 215% Great: 425%
Faspeed M3-90G 90GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 27GB free Firmware: 02000002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 96 9.7 79 8.4 67 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.5% Above average	Read 368 Write 233 Mixed 262 SusWrite 47.5 50% 228 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 94.9 4K Mixed 20.9 123% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 0.2 37% 88.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 60%
Vi550 S3 SSD 1TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 150GB free Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 3.2 151 265 130 446 MB/s Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	81.4% Excellent	Read 215 Write 92.8 Mixed 168 SusWrite 232 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 90.8 4K Mixed 41.3 153% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 207 171% 241 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB 1,166 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2000 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	MC Read 52.5 MC Write 53.2 MC Mixed 43.6 142% 49.8 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 24.1 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	38x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16