Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180111
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 15:31
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 258
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 562
69% 528 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.7% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 108
Parallax 100
83% 103 fps
MRender 79.7
Gravity 106
Splatting 94.5
77% 93.6 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,189
Write 6,107
Mixed 6156
1,376% 6,151 MB/s
4K Read 529
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 226
1,182% 309 MB/s
DQ Read 1,389
DQ Write 885
DQ Mixed 884
727% 1,053 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
733GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 141 142 142 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 171
Write 147
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 141
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
55GB free
Firmware: CC4G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 131 130 132 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 158
Write 123
Mixed 79
SusWrite 131
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 22.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback